NEWRecognition module — recognise hard work and the people going above and beyond
CareOptixCare software

Visits & reviews

What is a Regulation 45 review?

A Regulation 45 review is the registered person's own periodic review of the quality of care in a children's home, producing a written report on whether the home is meeting children's needs and what should change.

Regulation 45 review — diagram A Regulation 45 review is the registered person's own periodic review of the quality of care in a children's home, producing a written report on whether the home is meeting children's needs and what should change. Independent visit Someone unconnected to thehome, seeing what it… Report To the registered personand to Ofsted Quality of carereview The home's own honestaccount of itself Improvement Actions with an owner anda date, evidenced…
Regulation 45 review, shown in the cycle of visits and reviews.
Use this diagram+

Free to use on your own site, in training material or in a handout, as long as the credit link stays on it. Paste this where you want the diagram to appear.

<figure>
  <img src="https://careoptix.co.uk/glossary/regulation-45-review/diagram.svg" alt="Regulation 45 review — diagram from CareOptix" width="880" height="620" loading="lazy">
  <figcaption>
    <a href="https://careoptix.co.uk/glossary/regulation-45-review">What is a Regulation 45 review?</a> — diagram by
    <a href="https://careoptix.co.uk">CareOptix</a>
  </figcaption>
</figure>

Where Regulation 44 brings an outside eye, Regulation 45 is the home's own honest account of itself. Its value depends on that honesty: a review that concludes everything is satisfactory is usually a review that did not look.

It should draw on everything the home knows — independent visit reports, children's views, incidents, staffing, complaints — and reach conclusions about what needs to change rather than describing the period.

It is a document Ofsted will read, and a candid review with a clear improvement plan reads far better than a complacent one, even where it identifies real problems.

What goes wrong in practice

  • Written as a summary of the period rather than as an evaluation of quality.
  • Independent visit findings not drawn into it, so the two processes run separately.
  • No improvement actions arising, or actions with no owner or date.
  • Children's views absent, which is the evidence the review is supposed to weigh most.